Orphan drug development: Challenges, regulation, and success stories.

Rare diseases, also known as orphan diseases, are diseases with low occurrence in the population. Developing orphan drugs is challenging because of inadequate financial and scientific resources and insufficient subjects to run clinical trials. With advances in genome sequencing technologies, emergence of cell and gene therapies, and the latest developments in regulatory pathways, some orphan drugs that have curative potential have been approved. In India, due to its large population and resource crunch, developing orphan drugs is phenomenally challenging. After adopting the Orphan Drug Act, the US-FDA has continuously made advances in regulatory pathways for orphan drugs. Particularly, n-of-one clinical trials have been successful in some cases. India has recently adopted policies that have impacted the long-neglected rare-disease ecosystem; however, there is no clear regulatory path for orphan drug development in India. We have proposed a multi-pronged approach involving close collaboration between the government, regulatory bodies, industries, and patient advocacy groups to boost orphan drug development in India. We believe that rapidly evolving technologies and business models can enable better and faster development of novel orphan drugs in India and other resource-constrained countries.

Lessons from the Rare Diseases Registry and Analytics Platform framework for development of a national rare diseases registry for India.

Rare diseases (RD) pose significant challenges for healthcare systems globally, necessitating the establishment of disease registries to facilitate research, diagnosis, and treatment. This article explores the development of a comprehensive national RD registry for India, informed by insights gained through interactions with experts from India and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) region. The social and technological challenges involved in creating and maintaining a national RDs registry are highlighted. Moreover, the roles and responsibilities of different stakeholders are discussed. Additionally, the RD-RAP (Registry and Analytics Platform) framework is also discussed, which is an analytics-based RD registry model with multi-stakeholder end-user utility. Although developed for the APEC region, the RD-RAP framework holds promise in the Indian context. This article discusses the key features of the RD-RAP framework that are relevant and applicable to the Indian setting. By leveraging these insights, this research aimed to provide valuable guidance for the development and operation of a comprehensive national RD registry in India.

Enhancing access to treatment for Gaucher disease in India: The need for indigenous manufacturing.

Gaucher disease (GD) is a prevalent lysosomal storage disorder (LSD) that significantly impacts individuals' lives. However, the exorbitant prices of GD medications pose a major hurdle in ensuring widespread availability and affordability of treatment in India. The country heavily relies on imported medications, leading to high costs and limited access for many patients. This article aims to address this issue by advocating for the establishment of indigenous manufacturing capabilities for GD medicines in India. Through an examination of the current landscape of GD treatment, including the availability, affordability, and challenges associated with imported medications, this article highlights the urgent need for localized production. By focusing on the potential benefits of indigenous manufacturing, such as reduced costs, increased accessibility, and enhanced availability, this research aims to provide insights and recommendations to policymakers, healthcare professionals, and relevant stakeholders. The findings underscore the importance of developing domestic manufacturing capabilities to address the affordability and accessibility challenges faced by GD patients in India. The research also emphasizes the potential positive impact on the healthcare system, the pharmaceutical industry, and the overall well-being of individuals with GD. Ultimately, this article seeks to stimulate discussions and actions towards creating a sustainable framework for indigenous manufacturing of GD medicines, thereby improving the lives of those affected by this rare and debilitating condition.

A survey of awareness of diagnosis and treatment of rare diseases among healthcare professionals and researchers in India.

Rare diseases (RDs) are those that affect a small fraction of the total population. In India, where resources are scarce, the healthcare infrastructure and policy framework are focused on mitigating diseases that affect a large number of people. As a result,many cases ofRDs remain unreported, undiagnosed, and untreated. To understandthe currentlevel of RD awareness among healthcare professionals (HCPs) and researchers, as they are key stakeholders in diagnosis, treatment, policy making, and drug development, we conducted a survey based on identification of an RD, time for diagnosis, treatment options, and relationship with family history and geographic location. The survey was divided into two parts, one for researchers and the other for healthcare professionals, each consisting of 22 questions. We observed that among all our respondents, 31% of researchers and 29% of HCPs did not know the time required for diagnosis of a rare disease they mentioned in the survey. They identified the importance of family history but failed to realize its association with geographic location. The results from the exploratory study can provide information for enabling larger studies to develop recommendations and policies that can improve awareness about RDs in healthcare communities.

Expansion of India's national child healthcare programme, Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK), for rare disease management : a health policy perspective.

Rare diseases (RD) are severe and debilitating conditions. They are one of the leading causes of childhood mortality globally. In India, RDs have not been considered in most healthcare programs which usually cater to more common diseases. We believe, that for efficient utilization of resources in a resource-constrained healthcare system, existing programs must integrate RD management strategies. In this study, we explore the utility, expandability, and limitation of one of the important national child healthcare programs, Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK) which translates to National Child Healthcare Program. We found that RBSK has immense potential to cater to RDs through some of its unique features, such as comprehensive screening, wide target age group, and efficient utilization of resources. We provide recommendations that can help to strengthen the present program. This study will inspire other low-resource countries to identify and expand existing public healthcare programs for RD management. Moreover, RBSK can serve as a model program to integrate RD management globally.

Integrating rare disease management in public health programs in India: exploring the potential of National Health Mission.

Rare diseases (RD) are conditions that affect a small number of people and hence do not get the focus on government health priorities in a resource-constrained setting such as India. Therefore, it is essential to focus on strengthening and utilizing the existing public health framework for the optimal usage of healthcare resources. In this regard, National Health Mission (NHM) is one of the crucial programs initiated by the government of India to address the health needs of the under-served. As Phase 1 of the NHM moves towards completion, we explored the Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child, and Adolescent Health (RMNCH + A) program under NHM to assess their potential and limitations to aid RD care. We found that some of the disease-prevention initiatives of NHM address certain RDs and can easily be expanded to manage many such preventable RDs. In addition, NHM programs can provide a unique epidemiological data repository to strengthen the National Rare Disease Registry. These programs can also play important role in providing a continuum of care for many RDs that need lifelong management. However, existing programs have a limited scope to provide specialized RD-related treatments, which is better served in a more focused system. Thus, considering RDs in the design of the existing programs may help RD management better through prevention, data collection, and providing a continuum of care.

Discrepancies between FDA documents and ClinicalTrials.gov for Orphan Drug-related clinical trial data.

Clinical trial registries such as ClinicalTrials.gov (CTG) hold large amounts of data regarding trials. Drugs for rare diseases are known as orphan drugs (ODs), and it is particularly important that trials for ODs are registered, and the data in the trial record are accurate. However, there may be discrepancies between trial-related data that were the basis for the approval of a drug, as available from Food and Drug Administration (FDA) documents such as the Medical Review, and the data in CTG. We performed an audit of FDA-approved ODs, comparing trial-related data on phase, enrollment, and enrollment attribute (anticipated or actual) in such FDA documents and in CTG. The Medical Reviews of 63 ODs listed 422 trials. We used study identifiers in the Medical Reviews to find matches with the trial ID number, 'Other ID' or 'Acronyms' in CTG, and identified 202 trials that were registered with CTG. In comparing the phase data from the 'Table of Clinical Studies' of the Medical Review, with the data in CTG, there were exact matches in only 75% of the cases. The enrollment matched only in 70% of the cases, and the enrollment attribute in 91% of the cases. A similar trend was found for the sub-set of pivotal trials. Going forward, for all trials listed in a registry, it is important to provide the trial ID in the Medical Review. This will ensure that all trials that are the basis of a drug approval can be swiftly and unambiguously identified in CTG. Also, there continue to be discrepancies in trial data between FDA documents and CTG. Data in the trial records in CTG need to be updated when relevant.

Rare disease patients in India are rarely involved in international orphan drug trials.

We wished to determine whether rare diseases patients from India had been enrolled in international trials to develop novel orphan drugs. There are two reasons to be interested in this. (a) Different ethnic or racial groups may respond differently to a particular drug. India has huge ethnic diversity, and to exclude such participants is to severely limit the diversity of any trial; (b) Even if a suitable drug for a rare disease is available in India, it may be astronomically priced, in a country where most healthcare expenditure is out-of-pocket. We identified 63 orphan drugs, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) after 2008, for which there were 202 trials in the US government's clinical trial registry, ClinicalTrials.gov. Only nine of these trials had run in India. These trials pertained to six drugs. The drugs were for the conditions B-cell Lymphoma, Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Gaucher disease Type 1, Malaria, Myeloma and Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Further research is required as to why patients from India are not part of foreign drug development programmes for rare diseases. We then asked how many of the remaining 193 trials had recruited people of Indian origin, residing in other countries, and found that not more than 1% of these trials had done so. Also, only 11 of the 193 trials had recruited from other lower income countries. Participation from low-income countries in trials for orphan drugs is poor.

The work, goals, challenges, achievements, and recommendations of orphan medicinal product organizations in India: an interview-based study.

BACKGROUND: Orphan medicinal products (OMPs) are intended for the diagnosis, prevention, management or treatment of rare diseases (RDs). Each RD affects only a small fraction of the population, and therefore, historically, industry hesitated to undertake relevant research and development (R&D). In response, the governments of many countries came up with orphan drug policies and RD policies which were hugely successful in incentivizing companies to do so. In India, in the absence of any such policy until recently, there are very few organizations involved in RD R&D. OBJECTIVES: We wished to understand (i) the OMP Organizations' (OMPOs') areas of work and the nature of their work, (ii) their goals, (iii) the challenges they faced and how they were overcoming them, (iv) their achievements, and (v) their recommendations to the government to help their R&D, their success as commercial entities (where applicable), and patients' access to their products or services. RESULTS: Ten of the 14 OMPOs are companies, whereas four are not-for-profit organizations. Almost all of the OMPOs are heavily into R&D. Six have already made their products or services available to patients. Four plan to out-license their products after the pre-clinical phase or phase 1 trials, eight plan to cater to patients directly and two of the OMPOs have been established only recently and thus do not yet have any product or service to offer patients. Nine OMPOs import about 90% of the components in the production process, which comprises either capital or recurrent expenditure. For most, locally manufactured alternatives are not available or are of inadequate quality. Most of the OMPOs have had productive collaborations with local or foreign academics or hospitals for R&D, animal efficacy studies, clinical trials or providing services to patients. The main challenges for the OMPOs are the lack of adequate funding, supportive government policies, and a conducive ecosystem. CONCLUSIONS: These OMPOs are pioneers in their respective fields in India, and despite the challenges, have achieved new levels of innovation. With suitable government policies, they could scale up and provide relevant products and services to the large number of RD patients in the country whose medical needs are largely unmet.

The role of patient organizations in the rare disease ecosystem in India: an interview based study.

BACKGROUND: Rare diseases (RDs) affect a small percentage of the population but can be severely debilitating and life-threatening. Historically, patient groups (PGs) have been the prime movers in raising awareness about these diseases and advocating for national supportive policies. They have also driven relevant research programs. In India too, PGs have made significant contributions to the national RD ecosystem. OBJECTIVE: To assess the contribution of various Indian RD PGs, we carried out an interview-based study of 19organizations. This study aims to highlight the origins and achievements of these groups and the challenges that they have faced. The study also helps to capture the changes in the RD ecosystem that have taken place in recent years. RESULT: Of the 19 PGs, two are umbrella organizations, two are other organizations of national scope and 15 are disease specific groups. 14 interviewees were affected by an RD either directly or through a family member. Lack of awareness about RDs in the medical community was the biggest challenge, leading to a delay in diagnosis and subsequent management. Only two out of the 15 conditions have a definitive treatment. However, many of the diseases can be managed with replacement therapies administered for the patient's entire life, or other supportive therapies. Most diagnostics and treatment regimens that are available globally are now available in India but are expensive and usually available only in a few major cities. These problems are compounded by a lack of medical insurance schemes and government policies to support these patients. The biggest achievement of the PGs was the passing of National Policy for Treatment of Rare Diseases in 2017, unfortunately since put in abeyance. If reinstated, and properly implemented, this policy could significantly improve RD management in the country. CONCLUSION: PGs have had a significant role in bringing diagnostics and treatments to India. They have also raised awareness about RDs and related issues such as newborn screening, prenatal diagnostics and genetic counselling. This study highlighted the recommendations of various PGs. The government should address these recommendations and institutionalize the participation of the PGs in formal decision making.